After passing through several areas of Syria, the campaigns of “settlements” began dier ezzor following the expulsion of ISIS from most parts of the province, and who opens this file, comes to his mind many questions that need convincing answers.
It is noticeable that all the “settlement” in the war were the other face of surrender to its allies after years of resisting the blockade, steadfastness against the scorched earth policy pursued by the regime, the Russians and the Iranian-backed sectarian militias alike,Thus, the “settlement” is to preserve the lives of the remaining residents of the area who have taken the reconciliation decision.
In Deir Ezzor, the order was the opposite: the governorate after the fall of the section, most of which was in the hands of the regime and its allies, the phenomenon of “settlement” surfaced by some of its civilians or dissidents from the regime’s army,
To include the list of associates to the preacher in previous periods, that is, the settlements in Deir Ezzor appeared after the fall, not before or during, in addition to the ongoing adjustments within them, marked as “individual” and not “collective” as is the case in other Syrian regions that Preceded it in this context.
One of the questions that comes to mind in the field is the reasons for the multiplicity of parties that “settle in Deir al-Zour (regime, militias, Ross). And how were the “adjustments” ..? Have there been any “settlements” for civilians from Deir al-Zour who are outside Syria and have come to the governorate for this purpose?
Another question is whether there have been “settlements” for ISIS fighters.
And what happened to them after that? Have they returned to their homes or been forced to fight? What areas have experienced the highest proportion of “settlement” and why ?, and how does the “settlement” differ from the other “settlement” associated with the Russians or the militias? And why did some of those who took the decision of “settlement” to the Russians without others?
The information obtained by the Euphrates Post from its correspondents in the region and from its sources in the eastern Deir al-Zour countryside or within the neighborhoods of Deir al-Zour under the regime carries answers to most of the questions raised in this context.
According to the information received by the “Euphrates Post,” some residents of the areas where ISIS was expelled from, took the decision to reconcile with the regime, in return for return to their villages and towns, some of whom went to the Russians troops, because the holder of “settlement paper” issued by them can not any party The majority of whom are residents of the western village of Deir al-Zour on the eastern side of the Euphrates River (Chamia). Some of these people went to the militias controlling the area. This happened in some villages of the eastern countryside of Deir Ezzor.
According to the information received by the “Euphrates Post,” some residents of the areas where ISIS was expelled from, took the decision to reconcile with the regime, in return for return to their villages and towns, some of whom went to the Russians troops, because the holder of “settlement paper” issued by them can not any party The majority of whom are residents of the western village of Deir al-Zour on the eastern side of the Euphrates River (Chamia). Some of these people went to the militias controlling the area. This happened in some villages of the eastern countryside of Deir Ezzor.
The majority of those who took the “settlement” decision were lived in the neighborhoods lAl-Joura and Al-kusor in Deir al-Zour, where the security branches and the military leaders of the regime’s forces were present.
A source for the “Euphrates Post” confirmed that the “settlement” cases included some dissidents from the forces of the regime, who were forced to return to join his ranks, as well as those who are required to serve compulsory or reserve among these forces, a number of them killed or injured or captured on the fronts Fighting with the regime outside Deir Ezzor.
One thing worth mentioning when discussing the “settlements” file in Deir al-Zour is that there are cases of rejection by the Iranian-backed militias of some of the regime’s “settlement paper”, and demanding that the owner obtain a new “settlement” from the militia’s own leadership, Sometimes he is asked to pay money and sometimes he is arrested
This was achieved in some villages in the eastern countryside of Deir al-Zour. On the other hand, security branches of the regime in Deir al-Zour refused to “settle” their owners from the local militias of the regime, such as the “National Defense” militia, to be imprisoned or forced to Joining the ranks of the regime’s forces or a militia affiliated to the security branches.
The Euphrates Post also obtained confirmed information, indicating that ISIS elements had “settled” their situation, through the regime forces or Russian delegates in the region, forcing some of them to join a local militia, as well as “adjustments” “For a number of the people of the province coming from Lebanon or Damascus, following their contact with delegates assigned by the system to work in this area, noting that most of the” settlement “after coming from Lebanon,They were appended to the system forces under the name of compulsory or reserve service.
On the other hand, the “settlement” in the eastern villages of Deir al-Zour, especially by residents of the areas between the cities of Al-Mayadeen and Bu Kamal, remained among the lowest in the governorate, because there is a belief among the residents of the area that there is a return to it at any time, The days of the past, as the organization processes in the region and the expansion of the region, which threatens the possibility of falling in the hands of ISIS any moment.
It is noteworthy that the “settlement of the situation” is a procedure carried out by security forces by the forces of the regime to participate in any activities opposed to the regime, or to split it from its forces, or other accusations included by the regime under the “terrorist acts”, where the owner is given a paper exempted from In a similar procedure to what he was doing when he called for control of the area for all his former opponents or those who were on his wanted list. He gave the owner a “repentance card” bearing the characteristics of a “settlement” paper, but with the name of the donor Her, and her vocabulary.
.